Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Georgia Court of Appeals, 1929

Garnto v. State

Garnto v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 9, 1929 · Luke
40 Ga. App. 136; 149 S.E. 150; 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 46

Garnto v. State

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

Garnto was convicted of violating the “labor-contract law.” He assigns error upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial. Upon the authority of Johnson v. State, 18 Ga. App. 701-2 (90 S. E. 355), and King v. State, 3G Ga. App. 272 (136 S. E. 466), the evidence adduced upon the trial of this ease was insufficient to support the verdict of guilty. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. J. A. Merritt, for plaintiff in error. Fred Kea, solicitor-general, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑