1. In eacli of these eases special grounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the motion for a new trial are not complete and understandable within themselves and can not be considered by this court.

2. The verdict in each ease being demanded by the evidence, the alleged *273errors in the charge of the court, if errors, do not require another hearing of the case. The refusal in each case to grant a new trial was not error. Judgments affirmed.