Beverly v. Crowe

Georgia Court of Appeals
Beverly v. Crowe, 40 Ga. App. 538 (1929)
150 S.E. 436; 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 631
Broyles

Beverly v. Crowe

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

1. The order sustaining the demurrer to the petition and allowing a stated time in which to amend it, to which no exception was taken, fixed the law of the case; and, the plaintiff’s amendment having failed to meet the objections raised .by the demurrer (the amendment in all substantial respects being merely a reiteration of the allegations ' of the original petition), the trial court did not err in dismissing the petition. Baker v. Atlanta, 22 Ga. App. 483 (96 S. E. 332), and cit.; Grossman v. Atlanta, 25 Ga. App. 161 (102 S. E. 847).

2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant cases, the judge of'the superior court in each case properly overruled the certiorari. Judgments affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Beverly v. Crowe Shepherd v. Atlanta Finance Company Shepherd v. Southern Finance Company
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published