Georgia Court of Appeals, 1930

Boston Dry Goods Co. v. Rosa Jarmoulowsky Co.

Boston Dry Goods Co. v. Rosa Jarmoulowsky Co.
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided April 15, 1930 · Broyles
41 Ga. App. 314; 152 S.E. 852; 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 561

Boston Dry Goods Co. v. Rosa Jarmoulowsky Co.

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial is not argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and, therefore, is treated as abandoned.

2. This case was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury. The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the judgment rendered, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.