Georgia Court of Appeals, 1930

Pictorial Review Co. v. Coolik

Pictorial Review Co. v. Coolik
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided October 7, 1930 · Bloodworth
42 Ga. App. 176; 155 S.E. 383; 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 281

Pictorial Review Co. v. Coolik

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

1. The motion for a new trial is based upon the general grounds only. The jury settled the disputed questions of fact in favor of the defendant. The judge who presided approved the verdict, and this court is without power to reverse the ruling of the trial judge refusing a new trial.

2. The request of the defendant in error that damages be awarded him for bringing the ease to this court for delay is denied.

Judgment affii-med.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.