Georgia Court of Appeals, 1931

Findley v. State

Findley v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided March 31, 1931 · Bloodworth, Broyles, Coticur, Luke
43 Ga. App. 94; 157 S.E. 888; 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 196

Findley v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C, J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the overruling of a demurrer to an indictment can not be excepted to in a motion for a new trial. There must be a direct exception in the bill of exceptions. This ruling disposes of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

2. The jury were authorized to find from all the facts and circumstances of the case that the accused, at the time he obtained the money from the *95prosecutor, had formed the intent to cheat and swindle the prosecutor, and that such intent was carried out. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Decided March 31, 1931. TF. E. Lasseler, for plaintiff in- error. T. Eoyl Davis, solicitor-general, contra. Judgment affirmed. Luke <md Bloodworth, JJ., coticur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.