1. Under tlie facts of the case the exclusion of the testimony set forth in special ground 1 of the motion for a new trial, even if error, does not require a reversal of the judgment.

2. The excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in special ground 2 of the motion for a new trial, when considered in the light of the remainder of the charge, is not erroneous for any reason assigned.

3. The remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial and the general grounds of the motion are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error; and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.