Georgia Court of Appeals, 1933

North Carolina Mutual & Provident Ass'n v. Ross

North Carolina Mutual & Provident Ass'n v. Ross
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided October 6, 1933 · Broyles
47 Ga. App. 692; 171 S.E. 304; 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 603

North Carolina Mutual & Provident Ass'n v. Ross

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely in elaboration of the general grounds of the motion. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., eonmr.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.