Rozier v. State
Rozier v. State
48 Ga. App. 95; 171 S.E. 834; 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 468
Rozier v. State
Opinion of the Court
The evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial, and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. Therefore the verdict in favor of the State was unauthorized, and the court’s refusal to grant a new trial was error.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.