Craddock v. State
Craddock v. State
51 Ga. App. 205; 179 S.E. 844; 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 629
Craddock v. State
Opinion of the Court
Tlie accused was convicted of an assault with intent to rob. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for á new trial, based upon the usual general grounds. See, in this connection, Gore v. State, 162 Ga. 267 (134 S. E. 36).
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.