Radcliff v. State
Radcliff v. State
59 Ga. App. 335; 200 S.E. 812; 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 8
Radcliff v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquors which did not have thereon the revenue stamp of the State of Georgia, as required by law. The verdict was demanded by the evidence and the defendant’s statement to the jury; and the special grounds of the motion for new trial show no cause for another hearing of the, case. Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.