Tippins v. Spears
Tippins v. Spears
92 Ga. App. 495; 89 S.E.2d 210; 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 619
Tippins v. Spears
Opinion of the Court
Upon the call of this case there being no representation for the plaintiff in error, by brief or otherwise, and .it being- plainly apparent that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the motion of the defendant in error that the record be opened, the judgment therein affirmed, and penalty of ten percent for delay be awarded him is granted. Code § 6-1801; Code § 24-3634; James v. Sullivan, 24 Ga. App. 297 (100 S. E. 654).
Judgment affirmed, with penalty.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.