Georgia Court of Appeals, 1956

Godwin v. Hudson

Godwin v. Hudson
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided May 11, 1956 · Carlisle, Gardner, Townsend
93 S.E.2d 379; 93 Ga. App. 858; 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 879 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Godwin v. Hudson

Opinion

Carlisle, J.

1. “Where, in ruling upon demurrers, the trial court allows time for the filing of an amendment, such court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the jfieadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the earlier judgment on the demurrers, and such earlier judgment or judgments shall not be subject to exception or review.” Weinstein v. Rothberg, 87 Ga. App. 94 (1) (73 S. E. 2d 106); Sellars v. City of Summerville, 88 Ga. App. 109 (76 S. E. 2d 99); Aiken v. State Farm Mutual &c. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S. E. 2d 141). And, where the sole assignment of error contained in a *859 bill of exceptions in this court is upon, a judgment upon demurrers in which time was allowed for amendment, the writ of error must be

Decided May 11, 1956. Joe Salem, for plaintiff in error. G. Ernest Tidwell, Claude B. Boss, contra.

Dismissed.

Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.