Pittard v. United Press International, Inc.
Pittard v. United Press International, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
1. Where a radio broadcasting business conducted by a partnership is operated in' the trade name of “Sawnee Broadcasting Company,” and the duly authorized manager of said business enters into a contract with another for the furnishing of news service to the radio broadcasting station for a period of 5 years, which contract purports to
2. The verdict against the only resident defendant being unauthorized, the verdict against the individual, not a resident of the county, was also unauthorized. Hamilton v. DuPre, 111 Ga. 819 (2) (35 SE 684); Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Brown, 113 Ga. 414 (3) (38 SE 989, 84 ASR 250); Rounsaville v. McGinnis, 93 Ga. 579 (21 SE 123). Nothing to the contrary was ruled in Burger v. Noble, 81 Ga. App. 759 (59 SE2d 761), where, after verdict in favor of the resident defendant, the nonresident defendant moved for a new trial and was held to have consented to jurisdiction of the court. It follows, therefore, that the trial court erred in overruling the joint motion of both defendants for new trial on the general grounds only.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.