Georgia Court of Appeals, 1969

AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Moore

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 10, 1969 · Evans, Pannell, Quillian

171 S.E.2d 751; 120 Ga. App. 624; 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 884 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Brooks v. Carson (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
Moore v. Filler (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
All Risk Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Rockbridge Sanitation Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Habersham Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marcin (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Wallace v. Bledsoe (Ga. 1979)
Triplett v. Hillis (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Jackson v. Piper Aircraft Corp. (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Henderson v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc. (Ga. 1974)
Walker v. Robinson (Ga. 1974)
Rodriguez v. Newby (Ga. Ct. App. 1973)
J. C. Penney Co. v. Malouf Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
White v. Wright (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
Givens v. Gray (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
Residential Developments, Inc. v. Dodd (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

The appeal in this instance is from the denial of a motion to intervene. The Civil Practice Act and its *625 philosophy is to liberalize our statutes as to pleadings, and to allow multiple parties in one action. Where multiple parties are involved the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon “an express direction for the entry of judgment.” Indeed, said order without any such direction and determination is otherwise subject to revision at any time before a final judgment adjudicating all the claims and rights of the parties. Code Ann. § 81A-154 (b) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 658). Since there has been no express determination of no just reason for delay or direction that the order is final, providing for immediate appeal, or the issuance of a certificate as provided for by the 1968 amendment to the Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073; Code Ann. § 6-701 (2)), the appeal in this case is premature. The dismissal of a party is no different from an order denying an intervenor to become a party. Davis v. Roper, 119 Ga. App. 442 (167 SE2d 685); D. Davis & Co. v. Plunkett, 119 Ga. App. 453 (167 SE2d 663). Accordingly, the appeal must be

Argued April 7, 1969 Decided November 10, 1969. Brackett, Lyle & Arnall, H. P. Arnall, C. F. Brackett, Jr., for appellant. Hugh G. Head, Jr., Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Glover McGhee, for appellees.

Dismissed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.