Little v. State
Little v. State
133 Ga. App. 304; 211 S.E.2d 197; 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1048
Little v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was tried and convicted of theft by
1. The defendant contends that it was error to admit certain business records in evidence. The evidence in regard to the records was sufficient to meet the requirements of Code Ann. § 38-711 (Ga. L. 1952, p. 177) and their admission was not error.
2. The remaining enumerations of error are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.