McAuliffe v. State
McAuliffe v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. The trial judge did not err in overruling the motion to suppress the evidence seized. See in this connection, Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U. S. 108 (84 SC 1509, 12 LE2d 723); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U. S. 410 (89 SC 584, 21 LE2d 637); Sams v. State, 121 Ga. App. 46 (172 SE2d 473); Davis v. State, 129 Ga. App. 158, 159 (198 SE2d 913).
2. The evidence, though circumstantial in part, was sufficient to support the verdict of guilty on both indictments.
3. The defendant was tried and convicted on two indictments relating to illegal drugs while our two-step procedure for a trial and sentencing by jury was in effect. The trial judge erred in his judgment requiring the jury sentences to be served consecutively, when the jury, in their verdict subsequent to the sentence hearing, did not do so. Wade v. State, 231 Ga. 131 (200 SE2d 271); Mathis
Judgment reversed and remanded with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.