Singleton v. State
Singleton v. State
227 S.E.2d 472; 138 Ga. App. 706; 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2293
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Singleton v. State
Opinion
1. A motion to suppress evidence which is made orally is procedurally defective and a denial thereof is authorized. Code Ann. § 27-313 (b); Graves v. State, 135 Ga. App. 921 (219 SE2d 633).
2. Appellant complains of a portion of the district attorney’s closing argument. However, no objection was made at trial, and no reversible error appears. Gerdine v. State, 136 Ga. App. 561, 562 (3) (222 SE2d 128).
3. The evidence authorized the guilty verdict, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.