Highsmith v. Cone
Georgia Court of Appeals
Highsmith v. Cone, 138 Ga. App. 330 (1976)
226 S.E.2d 130; 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2148
Stolz
Highsmith v. Cone
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment sustaining the defendant’s motion to dismiss his complaint for damages based on alleged malicious prosecution. The complaint alleged that the defendant caused a public indecency warrant to. be issued against him, which resulted in his arrest and imprisonment; that the warrant was finally disposed of in his favor by being dead docketed; and that the prosecution was carried out without any probable cause. Held:
The case is controlled adversely to the plaintiff by the decision of this court in Courtenay v. Randolph, 125 Ga. App. 581 (188 SE2d 396).
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- HIGHSMITH v. CONE
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published