In this appeal from the revocation of defendant’s probation, the sole issue is whether the state produced legally sufficient evidence to authorize the court’s finding that defendant violated a term of his probation.

The revocation petition alleged that defendant violated Georgia’s public indecency statute by the lewd exposure of his sexual organs. Code § 26-2011 (b). At the hearing, the prosecution’s chief witness positively identified defendant as the person who followed her to a sorority house, unzipped his pants, and exposed his penis to her. This testimony was sufficient to satisfy the requirement of "slight evidence” necessary to support a finding of a probationary violation. Dickerson v. State, 136 Ga. App. 885 (222 SE2d 649); Scott v. State, 131 Ga. App. *336504 (206 SE2d 137).

Judgment affirmed.