Giles v. State
Giles v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellants were each found guilty of burglary and sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment. They appeal the denial of their motions for new trial.
1. The trial judge did not err in failing to give the appellants’ requested charge on reasonable doubt. The charge given was a full and correct statement of the law on this principle. See McClendon v. State, 231 Ga. 47, 48 (4) (199 SE2d 904) (1973); Young v. State, 226 Ga. 553 (5) (176 SE2d 52) (1970); Hardwick v. Price, 114 Ga. App. 817 (3) (152 SE2d 905) (1966).
2. The trial judge did not err in refusing to grant a
Judgments affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.