Gray v. Finance America Corp.
Gray v. Finance America Corp.
Opinion of the Court
The appellants, William J. Gray and Ruth Gray, appeal the judgment of the trial court awarding the appellee, Finance America Corp. of Ga., the principal on a defaulted loan plus attorney fees and court costs.
1. The appellees’ motion to dismiss is denied.
2. The initial averment in Finance America’s complaint was that it "at all times referred to was, and is duly licensed and doing business under the Georgia Industrial Loan Act.” The Grays did not deny this claim in their answer. "Averments in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is required... are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading.” Code Ann. § 81A-108 (d). Appellants are therefore barred from disputing the applicability of the Industrial Loan Act to this loan on appeal.
3. The trial judge did not make findings of fact or enter conclusions of law. "Judges of the superior court are required by Georgia Law (Ga. L. 1969, p. 645, as amended by Ga. L. 1970, p. 170) enacting a Code Section 81A-152 to 'find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon ...’ in cases submitted for trial without a jury. 'Such action is mandatory and not discretionary. [Cits.]’ Reese v. Ideal Realty Co., 128 Ga. App. 684 (197 SE2d 829).” Southern Guaranty Ins. Co. v. Duncan, 129 Ga. App. 632, 634 (200 SE2d 483) (1973).
We, therefore, remand this case to the trial judge
Appeal remanded with direction.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- GRAY v. FINANCE AMERICA CORPORATION OF GEORGIA
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published