Royals v. State
Royals v. State
Opinion of the Court
Julian Royals was indicted, tried by a jury, and convicted of incest and aggravated assault. On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to corroborate the prosecutrix’ testimony. Held:
During the course of the trial, the court conducted a Jackson-Denno hearing to determine the admissibility of an oral statement defendant made to Sheriff Bembry that ". . . young girls turned him on and that he had an affair with his daughters.” The trial court found that the
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.