Sanders v. State
Sanders v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant appeals his conviction for three counts of forgery. Held:
1. Error is urged on the trial judge’s failure to charge the provisions of Code Ann. § 26-1705.4 (CCG § 1705.4; Ga. L. 1969, pp. 128, 131) involving credit card fraud, which charge the defendant requested in writing. This enumeration is without merit since under the indictment as drawn, charging the defendant with forgery, Code § 26-1705.4 was not a lesser included offense. See Code Ann. § 26-505 (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1249, 1267).
2. The defendant’s contention that certain evidence was inadmissible is without merit.
3. The trial judge’s action in increasing the defendant’s bond would not require the judge to disqualify himself from the trial of the case.
4. We do not consider an alleged error which was
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.