Heard v. State
Heard v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant was convicted of burglary and forgery. An Anders motion (Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1966)) was filed by co-counsel on the trial who was requested by the defendant to conduct the appeal. The brief accompanying the motion contains a thorough analysis of the facts of the case, suggestions for possible enumerations of error, and applicable law. The court has perused the brief and also examined the record and transcript and is satisfied that an appeal would be wholly frivolous.
Accordingly, counsel is granted permission to
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.