Hunt v. State
Hunt v. State
157 Ga. App. 407; 278 S.E.2d 61; 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1844
Hunt v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is a pro se appeal from a burglary conviction. The defendant has filed no enumeration of errors.
1. There was an eyewitness to the burglary. The evidence, although conflicting, was amply sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
2. At the close of the charge, defendant’s trial counsel stated he
From an examination of the record, no basis for reversal appears.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.