Busby v. State
Busby v. State
Opinion of the Court
This appeal was taken from an order revoking the appellant’s probation. Appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal was wholly frivolous. Anders v. California, 386
Appellant’s sole enumeration of error contends that the trial judge in the probation revocation order failed to follow the recommendation of the probation officer. We find no merit in this contention and our independent review of the record and transcript reveals no reversible error.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.