Widener v. Ravenscroft
Widener v. Ravenscroft
Opinion of the Court
Ravenscroft, an employee of Widener, d/b/a Southland Erection Company, was injured on the job. Ravenscroft sued Wright, the general contractor. Wright filed a third-party complaint against Widener, the subcontractor, on the basis of an indemnification agreement between Wright and Widener. Ravenscroft dismissed his complaint against Wright with prejudice. The trial court’s order dismissing the original complaint states: “Nothing in this order shall be construed to affect the third party complaint in this action.” Widener appeals contending that the dismissal of the original claim is a final, appealable order as to the third-party action. We do not agree.
While this case presents challenging and interesting issues on its
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.