Kowalchick v. State
Kowalchick v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of one count of armed robbery and one count of motor vehicle theft. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered on the guilty verdicts.
Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). As envisioned by Anders, appellant’s attorney has filed a brief raising points of law which arguably could support the appeal. In addition, appellant has filed a pro se brief. As required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), we have fully examined
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.