Carter v. State
Carter v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of armed robbery and aggravated assault on a peace officer in the performance of his official duty. His appointed counsel filed an appeal but requested that he be allowed to
In further compliance with Anders, supra, we have carefully and fully examined the record and transcript and find no reversible error. The evidence presented at trial is sufficient to meet the standards of proof required by Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560).
Request to withdraw as counsel granted and judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.