Kwik Bond v. State
Kwik Bond v. State
Opinion of the Court
In each of these four cases, appellant-surety executed a bond on behalf of a criminal defendant. The bonds gave notice of the specific dates and times that appellant’s principals would be arraigned but also required that they appear for arraignment from day-to-day and from term-to-term thereafter. Appellant’s principals did not appear for their originally scheduled arraignments. The trial court reset the arraignments for several months later. Notice of the rescheduled arraignment dates was received by appellant but its principals again failed to appear. After conducting a hearing as to bond forfeiture, the trial court entered final judgments against appellant. It is from those judgments that appellant brings these appeals. Because the facts and the legal issues are identical, the four cases have been consolidated for disposition in this single opinion.
Appellant enumerates the judgments as erroneous because they are contrary to law. Appellant urges that the State, having failed to proceed upon the principals’ initial failures to appear, may not now
Judgments affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- KWIK BOND v. STATE OF GEORGIA (four cases)
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published