In Cendant Mobility Financial Corp. v. Asuamah, 1 the Supreme Court reversed Division 4 (b) of our decision in Asuamah v. Haley, 2 in which we held that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Cendant, the non-builder/seller, on the plaintiff/ *880 purchaser’s claim of negligent repairs. 3 In reversing, the Supreme Court concluded that

the “negligent construction” exception to caveat emptor exempts from the defense of caveat emptor only a negligence claim by a homeowner seeking recovery against the builder/seller of the home for latent building construction defects about which the purchaser/homeowner did not know and in the exercise of ordinary care would not have discovered, which defects either were known to the builder/seller or in the exercise of ordinary care would have been discovered by the builder/seller. Inasmuch as Cendant is not a builder/seller of the dwelling purchased by Asua-mah, the trial court did not err when it granted summary judgment to Cendant. 4

Accordingly, we vacate Division 4 (b) of our opinion, adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court as our own, and affirm the judgment of the trial court. Divisions 1 through 4 (a) and Division 5 of our opinion were not affected by the Supreme Court’s decision and thus remain in effect. 5

Judgment affirmed.