Georgia Court of Appeals, 2013

Charles Bannister v. Keyonna Johnson

Charles Bannister v. Keyonna Johnson
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided September 26, 2013

Charles Bannister v. Keyonna Johnson

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,__________________ September 26, 2013 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A13A0868. CHARLES BANNISTER v. KEYONNA JOHNSON.

This case originated in magistrate court wherein plaintiff Charles Bannister was awarded a judgment of $13,317. Defendant Keyonna Johnson appealed to the superior court. After a jury trial, Bannister was awarded $1,250. Johnson then filed a motion for attorney’s fees, pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-68. The superior court granted Johnson’s motion and entered a judgment in Johnson’s favor. Bannister filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Bannister was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003). “Even when the superior court decides an issue that was not raised or considered in the magistrate court, any appeal to this court must be pursuant to the discretionary appeal procedure because the case reached the superior court through a de novo appeal from the magistrate court.” Bullock, supra at 876. Bannister’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 09/26/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.