Paul Brent Howell v. State
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
June 29, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A16D0425. PAUL BRENT HOWELL v. THE STATE.
Paul Brent Howell seeks discretionary review of the trial court’s order denying his motion for sentence modification. A sentencing court may modify a sentence within one year of its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal, whichever is later. See OCGA § 17-10-1 (f); Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 347-348 (691 SE2d 247) (2010). The denial of a timely motion to modify under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f) is subject to direct appeal. See, e. g., Anderson v. State, 290 Ga. App. 890 (660 SE2d 876) (2008); Maldonado v. State, 260 Ga. App. 580 (580 SE2d 330) (2003).
This Court will grant a timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). From the limited application material submitted, it appears the order at issue is subject to direct appeal.1
Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED. Howell shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court if he has not already done so. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). The clerk of the superior court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
06/29/2016
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.