Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Sterling Brown, as Surviving Spouse
Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Sterling Brown, as Surviving Spouse
Opinion
*187
In
Doherty v. Brown
,
Thus, we vacate our opinion in these cases and adopt the opinion of our Supreme Court as our own. In accordance with the directive of the Supreme Court, the jury's verdict *260 must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. *188 Judgment reversed.
Rickman and Goss, JJ., concur.
The plaintiff-appellants in Case No. A16A0764,
Brown et al. v. Southeastern Pain Specialists
,
et al.
, did not file a separate petition challenging this Court's affirmance of the trial court's exclusion of certain evidence and denial of their motion for a mistrial. Thus, as to the evidentiary issues ruled on and asserted in that appeal, the Supreme Court held that the issues were "beyond the scope of [its] grant of certiorari" but, "the trial court remains free to revisit its ruling as it considers the admissibility of evidence on retrial."
Southeastern Pain Specialists
at
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.