Georgia Court of Appeals, 2018

Prince Amun-Ra Meduty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Prince Amun-Ra Meduty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 1, 2018

Prince Amun-Ra Meduty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ October 23, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A19A0486. PRINCE AMUN-RA MEDUTY v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

This case began as an action for damages in magistrate court. Following judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, Prince Amun-Ra Meduty appealed to the superior court, which granted summary judgment to Wells Fargo Bank. Meduty then appealed directly to this Court. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Appeals from superior court decisions reviewing lower court decisions by certiorari or de novo proceedings must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), (b); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Meduty’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/23/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.