Ryan Andrew Mullins v. State
Ryan Andrew Mullins v. State
Opinion
*890 Ryan Andrew Mullins appeals from an order of the Brantley County Superior Court dismissing his motion to withdraw his guilty plea for lack of jurisdiction. Mullins contends that the trial court erred in finding that his motion was filed outside the term of court in which he was sentenced and was therefore untimely. We agree and reverse the trial court's order.
The facts are undisputed and show that at a hearing held on September 6, 2017, Mullins pled guilty to two counts of child molestation, two counts of sexual exploitation of children, and a single count each of aggravated child molestation and aggravated sexual battery. 1 After accepting Mullins's plea, the trial court followed the State's sentencing recommendation and orally pronounced a sentence of life, with the first 25 years to be served in confinement and the remainder to be served on probation. The trial court reduced this sentence to writing, and the judge signed the written judgment of conviction and sentence on September 6, 2017. That document, however, was not filed with the clerk of court until October 9, 2017.
*891 Less than two weeks later, on October 20, 2017, Mullins filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Following a hearing, the trial court dismissed that motion, and Mullins now appeals the order of dismissal.
Under Georgia law, "[a] motion to withdraw a guilty plea must be filed within the same term of court as the sentence entered
*449
on the guilty plea."
Brooks v. State
,
In dismissing Mullins's motion, the trial court found that because sentence was orally pronounced and the court signed the judgment of conviction and sentence during the January term of court, Mullins was required to file his motion to withdraw during that same term. This holding, however, is in direct conflict with relevant precedent. Georgia's appellate courts have long recognized that even where a judge orally pronounces a sentence, no sentence or conviction actually exists until it is reduced to writing and filed with the clerk of court. See
Curry v. State
,
*892
Relying on the foregoing principles, this Court has held that under circumstances such as these, where sentence is pronounced during one term of court but the written order is not filed until the next term, a defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea is "timely filed within the term in which the sentence was entered, that is, filed by the clerk."
Allen
,
Judgment reversed and case remanded.
Dillard, C. J., and Hodges, J., concur.
The record shows that this was a negotiated guilty plea, with the State agreeing to nolle prosse four of 10 counts on which Mullins had been indicted, including one count of aggravated child molestation, one count of enticing a child for indecent purposes, and two counts of sexual exploitation of children.
In 2018, the General Assembly amended OCGA § 15-6-3 so that, effective January 1, 2019, the terms of the Brantley County Superior Court begin on the fourth Monday of February and August. OCGA § 15-6-3 (41) (B) (2018).
In the trial court, the State opposed the motion on the grounds that it was untimely. On appeal, however, the State concedes that in light of Allen and other relevant precedent, Mullins's motion to withdraw his guilty plea was timely.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.