Lanikki Jones v. Young Jamal Hughley, Sr.
Lanikki Jones v. Young Jamal Hughley, Sr.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ May 16, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A22E0049. JONES v. HUGHLEY.
Upon consideration of Appellant’s “Emergency Motion for a Stay and Supersedeas of the Trial Court’s Order Entered on May 13, 2022,” the same is DENIED. See OCGA §§ 5-6-34 (e); 5-6-35 (k). See also Blackmore v. Blackmore, 311 Ga. App. 885, 888 (1) (717 SE2d 504) (2011) (“[G]iven the Supreme Court’s acknowledgment of the trial court’s broad authority to decide matters of the supersedeas effect of child custody rulings, as well as the trial court’s mandate to protect the best interest and welfare of the children pending appeal, we see no reason to limit the trial court’s authority [to deny supersedeas regarding its visitation order].”) (citation and punctuation omitted).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/16/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.