H & M Investments, LLC v. Baileys Bp Shoppes, LLC
H & M Investments, LLC v. Baileys Bp Shoppes, LLC
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ October 18, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A23A0389. H & M INVESTMENTS, LLC v. BAILEYS BP SHOPPES, LLC.
This case began in magistrate court after Baileys BP Shoppes, LLC filed a dispossessory proceeding against H & M Investments, LLC. Following an unfavorable ruling in the magistrate court, H & M appealed to the superior court.
Baileys filed a motion for summary judgment, which the superior court subsequently granted and issued a writ of possession to Baileys. H & M then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
Appeals from superior court decisions reviewing lower court decisions by certiorari or de novo proceedings must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), (b); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). H & M’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/18/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.