Carter Arnold v. State
Carter Arnold v. State
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ May 09, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A23A1047. CARTER ARNOLD v. THE STATE.
A jury found Carter Arnold guilty of child molestation, aggravated sexual battery, rape and statutory rape in 2013. Arnold filed a direct appeal in 2015, but that appeal was dismissed because he failed to file a brief and enumeration of errors. See Case No. A15A1703 (dismissed Jun. 30, 2015). In 2022, Arnold filed an extraordinary motion for new trial. The trial court denied the motion, and Arnold filed this direct appeal from that ruling. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
An appeal from an order denying an extraordinary motion for new trial must be made by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Davis v. State, 182 Ga. App. 736, 736-737 (356 SE2d 762) (1987). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Hair Restoration Specialists, Inc. v. State, 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021) (citation and punctuation omitted). Arnold’s failure to follow the discretionary appeals procedure thus deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Davis, 182 Ga. App. at 736-737.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/09/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.