Wilmot Stubblefield v. Loomis Armored US, LLC
Wilmot Stubblefield v. Loomis Armored US, LLC
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ August 08, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A25A0078. WILMOT STUBBLEFIELD v. LOOMIS ARMORED US, LLC.
In this action for fraud and related claims, pro se defendant Wilmot Stubblefield filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order scheduling a bench trial. We lack jurisdiction.
Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.”
Here, the trial court’s order scheduling a bench trial is a non-final order that did not resolve all issues in this case. Consequently, Stubblefield was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures — including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court — to appeal the order scheduling a bench trial. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588-589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Bailey, 266 Ga. at 833.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/08/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.