Ramon McCray v. State
Ramon McCray v. State
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ August 19, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A26A0148. RAMON MCCRAY v. THE STATE.
Ramon McCray was arrested and charged with two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He filed a motion for bond , which the trial court denied.
He then filed this pro se notice of appeal. Pretermitting whether McCray properly filed this appeal pro se,1 we lack jurisdiction.
Appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below[.]” OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) (B). Here, the order McCray seeks to appeal is not a final judgment as the case remains pending in the trial court. Consequently, he was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedure — including obtaining a timely certificate of immediate review from the trial court — to appeal the order denying his request for bond. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Mullinax v. State, 271 Ga. 112, 112 (1) (515 SE2d 839) (1999). His failure to
McCray appears to be represented by counsel below. comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Mullinax, 271 Ga. at 112 (1).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/19/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.