CLAYTON v. MARTIN

United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

CLAYTON v. MARTIN

Trial Court Opinion

IFNO TRH TEH UEN MITIDEDDL SET DAITSETSR DICISTT ORFIC GTE COORUGRIAT MACON DIVISION

EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON, : : Plaintiff, : : VS. : : NO.: 5:20-CV-270-MTT-MSH Deputy Warden ERIC MARTIN, : et al., : : Defendants. : ________________________________ :

ORDER Plaintiff Earnest Barnard Clayton, a prisoner in Baldwin State Prison in Hardwick, Georgia, filed a

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action and moved to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1; 2. On August 21, 2020, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis because Plaintiff had approximately $2,930.00 in his prisoner account. ECF No. 9. The Court, therefore, ordered Plaintiff to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full. Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or otherwise respond to the Court’s Order. On September 10, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or comply with the Court’s August 21, 2020 Order. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee as ordered by the Court or otherwise responded to the Order to show cause. Due to Plaintiff’s failure to follow the Court’s Orders and prosecute this action, the case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep’t,

205 F. App’x 802, 802

(11th Cir. 2006) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Lopez v. Aransas Cty. Indep. Sch. Dist.,

570 F.2d 541, 544

(5th Cir. 1978)) (“The court may dismiss an action sua sponte under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute or failure to obey a court order.”). SO ORDERED, this 1st day of October, 2020.

S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Reference

Status
Unknown