Lodge v. Barr
Lodge v. Barr
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- x ROBERT LODGE, : : Petitioner, : : MEMORANDUM & ORDER -against- : : 20-cv-2971 (ENV) WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United : States, : : Respondent. : -------------------------------------------------------------- x VITALIANO, D.J. Petitioner Robert Lodge, proceeding pro se and presently being held in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody at Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, brings this action under
28 U.S.C. § 2241seeking his immediate release from custody because he claims that he has a higher risk for complications from COVID-19.1 To consider a habeas petition under § 2241, a court must have jurisdiction over the petitioner’s custodian. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla,
542 U.S. 426, 434(2004) (“[T]he proper respondent to a habeas petition is ‘the person who has custody over [the petitioner].’” (second alteration in original) (quoting
28 U.S.C. § 2242)); see also Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ky.,
410 U.S. 484, 494–95 (1973). Thus, venue for a habeas petition under § 2241 that challenges a petitioner’s physical confinement generally lies in the district of his confinement. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. at 441–42; Pugin v. Barr, No. 20-cv-2825 (PKC),
2020 WL 3489494, at *1 (June 26, 2020). Because petitioner is in the custody of the Warden of Stewart Detention Center,
1 Petitioner filed another similar petition in this Court. See Lodge v. Barr, No. 20-cv-2970 (RPK). The Court notes that in the instant petition, petitioner also seeks the immediate release of 14 other inmates, but his is the only name in the caption of the petition, and he is the only person who signed it. located in Lumpkin, Georgia, venue properly lies in the Northern District of Georgia, and transfer of this action is appropriate. See
28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. See
28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1404(a). The seven-day waiting period under Local Rule 83.1 is waived. The Court notes that petitioner did
not pay the required filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed. So Ordered. Dated: Brooklyn, New York July 14, 2020 /s/ Eric N. Vitaliano ERIC N. VITALIANO United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown