CROSS v. DAVIDSON
CROSS v. DAVIDSON
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i = : □□□□ FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ee 120 OCT 29 P WI DUBLIN DIVISION
DARRELL D. CROSS, ) LE! a ) ad We ms ie Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 320-058 ) KECIA DAVIDSON; COUNSELOR ) GORDON; CORRECTIONS OFFICER ) BURKE; VIRGINIA SMITH; CPT. SID ) ANDREWS; and SERGEANT LOCKETTE, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, (doc. no. 3), and motion to stay, (doc. no. 8), and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer,
284 F.3d 1234. 6 (11th Cir. 2002) (per curiam). SO ORDERED this 24%, of i » , 2020, at Augusta, Georgia.
fi ida, Wd □□ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown