Rice v. Ward

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 7 □□ DUBLIN DIVISION 21 HAR 22 P 3. □□ CHARLES RICE, ) £ GS Plaintiff, 5 v. CV 321-004

TIM WARD, Commissioner; DIRECTOR

SHEPPARD; JERMAINE WHITE, Warden; _)

DEPUTY WARDEN WICKER; DEPUTY __ )

WARDEN KEITH; and DEPUTY WARDEN )

BEASLEY, )

Defendants,

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 8.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's requests to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. nos. 2, 5), DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, (doc. no. 3), and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Pa.mer. 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002) (per curiam). SO ORDERED this 2 2neday of March, 2021, at Augusta, Georgia.» 7 Nf □□□ ©) We dy SL

INTTED STIS DISTRICT TIBGE