ROYAL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION P. P. R., : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Case No. 5:21-cv-319-CHW : COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, : Social Security Appeal : Defendant. : : ORDER In response to Plaintiff’s arguments, the Commissioner acknowledges that a remand is warranted in this social security appeal. The Commissioner’s motion for a remand (Doc. 11) is hereby GRANTED. The Court REMANDS the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1 See Shalala v. Schafer, 509 U.S. 292, 296–97 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98 (1991). On remand, the Commissioner will reevaluate the evidence and issue a new decision.
SO ORDERED, this 18th day of March, 2022.
s/ Charles H. Weigle Charles H. Weigle United States Magistrate Judge
1 Sentence four of § 405(g) provides: “The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.