ROBINSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

ROBINSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

K.R.,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 7:22-CV-6 (HL)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act. (Doc. 13). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. On June 1, 2022, the Court entered an Order reversing and remanding the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to Sentence Four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g). (Doc. 11). On August 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a timely motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(d), a provision of the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (Doc. 13). Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,910.32, representing 34.15 hours of work performed, filing costs of $402.00, and expenses of $22.59 for service of process by certified mail, to be paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. The Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), as codified at

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(d)(1)(A), provides that "a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses, . . . incurred by that party in any civil action . . . brought by or against the United States in any court having jurisdiction

of that action, unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust." Under the EAJA, attorney’s fee awards are calculated by multiplying the number of hours reasonably expended by the reasonable hourly rate for the attorney’s services. Jean v. Nelson,

863 F.2d 759, 773

(11th Cir. 1988). The EAJA provides

that “attorney fees shall not be awarded in excess of $125 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living justifies a higher rate.” § 2412(d)(2)(A)(ii); United States v. Aisenberg,

358 F.3d 1327, 1342

(11th Cir. 2004). Here, Plaintiff seeks fees at the EAJA cap adjusted for an increase in the cost of living during the period of representation and based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. (Doc.

13-1, p. 4; Doc. 13-3; Doc. 13-4). The Commissioner does not challenge the amount of fees sought, Plaintiff’s status as the prevailing party, or the justification for an award of attorney’s fees. Accordingly, the Court awards the requested amount of $7,910.32, representing 34.15 hours of attorney representation, $402.00 in filing

costs, and $22.59 for service expenses. Pursuant to the dictates of Astrue v. Ratliff,

560 U.S. 586

(2010), payment shall be made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel, unless Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt. If the 2 United States Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the Government may accept Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees

and pay fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. SO ORDERED this 30th day of August, 2022.

s/ Hugh Lawson_______________ HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE

aks

3

Reference

Status
Unknown