BARRETT v. WHITTINGTON
BARRETT v. WHITTINGTON
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION LOUIS BARRETT, JR., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 5:22-cv-00271-TES-CHW Warden LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff Louis Barrett, Jr. filed a request for additional time to object to the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Doc. 5]. See [Doc. 8]. Plaintiff filed his request on October 17, 2022, which is within the 14-day period to request an extension to file objections.1 See [Doc. 8, p. 1]; [Doc. 5, p. 8]. Accordingly, the Court VACATES its prior Order [Doc. 6] and Judgment [Doc. 7], and GRANTS Plaintiff 14 additional days to respond and file objections. SO ORDERED, this 1st day of November, 2022.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 The prison mailbox rule requires that a pro se prisoner’s filing be deemed filed on the date it is delivered to prison officials for mailing. Absent evidence to the contrary, the date the prisoner signs the document is considered the date delivered. See Daniels v. United States,
809 F.3d 588(11th Cir. 2015).
Reference
- Status
- Unknown