UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

RANDY EDWARDS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CV422-191 ) VICTOR WALKER, Warden ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER Pro se petitioner Randy Edwards has filed a petition for habeas corpus relief, pursuant to

. See doc. 1. The Court proceeds to screen his Petition. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Edwards’ Petition challenges his “2013-2014” conviction in the Superior Court of Floyd County, Georgia.

. He alleges that his incarceration “is fueled by conspiracy, violations of oath by State judicial officials, constituting false arrest, false imprisonment under color of law, via misguided discretion, abuse of authority, [and] kidnapping to obstruct justice.”

. It is clear that this Court is not the proper forum for Edwards Petition.1

Federal law allows § 2254 petitions to be filed in the district within which the petitioner was convicted or in the district within which he is

confined.

(d); Wright v. Indiana,

(11th Cir. 2008). Edwards is incarcerated in Effingham County, Georgia. See doc. 1 at 15. Thus, this Court has jurisdiction over the petition.

Nevertheless, it is a longstanding judicial policy and practice to funnel such petitions into the district within which the state prisoner was convicted, since that will be the most convenient forum. Eagle v.

Linahan,

, 933 n. 9 (11th Cir. 2001); see also Mitchell v. Henderson,

, 436 (5th Cir. 1970); Wright,

. That practice also fosters an equitable distribution of habeas cases

between the districts. Floyd County, where Edwards was convicted, lies in the Northern District of Georgia. See

(a)(3).

1 The Clerk notified Edwards of his failure to either pay the Court’s filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis. See doc. 3. Payment of the filing fee is not jurisdictional. See White v. Lemma,

(11th Cir 2020). Since, as discussed below, it is clear that this Court is not the proper venue for Edwards’ Petition, the transferee court is the proper place to resolve any issue with his filing fee. Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for all further proceedings. See

(a) (permitting a district court to transfer any civil action

to another district or division where it may have been brought for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice); Rufus

v. Kemp,

at * 1 (S.D. Ga. June 12, 2013). SO ORDERED, this 11th day of August, 2022. ( Latghond La Christopher L. Ray “E United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Georgia